Letters and statements of support

Sara Wenger Shenk offers “proposal to pivot”
MAST MAST

Sara Wenger Shenk offers “proposal to pivot”

“I believe, based on my experience of leadership in three different Mennonite institutions (Eastern Mennonite Seminary, Anabaptist Mennonite Biblical Seminary and Virginia Mennonite Conference), that there are ways MCC could have responded (and still could) that would relieve the suffering of those who’ve been harmed, and enhance the integrity and vitality of MCC. While I’m aware that there are disagreements about the facts and what constitutes abuse, what seems indisputable to me is that the public statements MCC has made, with their minimizations and denials of abuse, have only exacerbated the sense of institutional betrayal for those in pain.”

Read More
Kim Thiessen responds to MCC leaders about “apology” monograph
MAST MAST

Kim Thiessen responds to MCC leaders about “apology” monograph

“To not agree to an external investigation, to me, implies that there are things that MCC leadership and boards want to hide, decisions and actions they want to cover up. Restoration and reconciliation cannot happen without truth telling. And truth telling must be driven by the people who have been harmed. They are the ones to lay out the terms, with proper support. And in that truth telling process there must be public accountability.”

Read More