MCC, stop harming your workers and partners now! - Click to read messages from caring constituents.
〰️
MCC, stop harming your workers and partners now! - Click to read messages from caring constituents. 〰️
MCC Abuse Survivors Together
Justice - Accountability - Transparency
Case counter
87
(cases of abuse documented by MAST as of Feb. 2, 2026)
Browse our site for the latest news, survivor stories and documents, statements from supporters, reflection and analysis, and ways to get involved.
Latest News
Blog
Survivor Stories
Allegations about abuse of workers within Mennonite Central Committee
Compiled by MCC Abuse Survivors Together (MAST) in June 2025 (for the most up to date case count, see case counter at top of home page). PDF version available here.
Check back here for regular updates; see the Survivors page for individual stories. To share your story, see https://www.mccabusesurvivors.org/share.
Notes
In addition to abuse experienced during employment (abusive mediation, sexual abuse, negligence of safety, psychological harassment), MCC leaders often responded in a harmful way to those who reported abuse or suspected fraud (for example with [more] psychological harassment, by firing the workers in cruel or callous ways, sometimes despite protected status, or by covering up the abuse with NDAs). In most of the 67 cases known to MAST, multiple types of abuse were present. MCC leadership continues to deny the existence of systemic abuse.
MAST is aware of 14 cases where NDAs were offered at termination; 11 of these were signed, sometimes under duress.
Sectors of MCC where abuse is reported include Executive leadership, Senior staff in US & Canada, Human Resources, Planning/Learning/Disaster Response, SALT, IVEP and YAMEN, International program leadership, Communications and Donor Relations, Financial Services, Voluntary Service, Ten Thousand Villages, Thrift
43 cases involve workers in International Program; North American service workers who reported about abuse very frequently mentioned the additional victimization of more vulnerable local staff, who often do not feel safe to come forward with details and be added to the tally.

In late 2025, MAST issued a general call for letters to the MCC US boards ahead of their October meetings in Akron. More than 20 people responded with public letters, urging the boards to (1) commit to an external investigation of all allegations, (2) release survivors from NDAs, and (3) accept the proposed conversation parameters with John Clarke and Anicka Fast.
MAST has learned from a source that the allegations continued to be minimized and dismissed at the board meetings, while discussion focused overwhelmingly on anger that board members’ emails had been leaked.
In the week following the board meetings, the MCC US and Canada national boards agreed to the facilitators’ proposed parameters for a conversation with John and Anicka. And in December, the West Coast MCC board chairs invited another survivor couple, Kathryn and Dan Smith Derksen, to a “listening session” to hear their story. However, MCC has offered no response to the letter-writers’ requests for an external investigation and an end to the use of NDAs.
Overall, MCC’s “listening” continues to be limited in scope and unaccompanied by action for accountability and repair. MCC continues to try to control the timeline and the process of listening to survivors.